Episode 09: Mary Elizabeth Rollins Lightner

Written by Lindsay Hansen Park on . Posted in year of polygamy

Join Lindsay for the primer series on Mormon Polygamy that will begin with the wives of Joseph Smith and eventually broaden to contemporary strains of the practice today. This episode deals with Mary Rollins Lightner. [powerpresss] Links mentioned in the podcast:

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Comments (13)

  • Alan

    |

    I really like the narration – she did a great job! Actually, hearing what they said themselves is a great addition to Lindsay’s summary. Thank you!

    Reply

  • Chris

    |

    This episode was superb! I really liked the set-up and the delivery, it added a dimension. 🙂

    Reply

  • Mark Rollins

    |

    As a descendant of Mary Rollins, I have been and continue to be interested in her story. I have her autobiography before me as I write this. I was following along with the narration. The reader starts out word for word. Around 5:20 Lindsey editorializes and then the reader continues from Mary’s 1905 testimony, not from her journal or autobiography. An uninformed and unsuspecting listener would assume that this is a continuation of her autobiography. This is deceitful.

    I am disappointed in this dishonest presentation of Mary’s autobiography mixed in with her 1905 testimony at BYU. As any reader can know, Mary’s autobiography doesn’t mention anything about Joseph as a love interest, polygamy, or angel visits. These are all “recollections” when she is 87 years old giving a talk at BYU.

    In every instance when her 1905 comments at BYU mention a story that was included in her autobiography, read the bio at the same time frame and notice what is missing. That is, if you care to look at this honestly.

    Mind you, her autobiography is written after she arrives in Utah in 1863, long after the polygamy cat is out of the bag, so no reason not to mention in a post-1863 bio that she married the most famous Mormon after an angel told her to.

    Why do you suppose these crowning events of her life didn’t receive so much as an honorable mention in her autobiography?

    She records in her journal July 22, 1863 “Had a thunder shower, no sickness yet.”

    So ti rained, but that whole Angel thing with the sword slipped her mind? Then at 87 years old she suddenly remembers? It simply didn’t happen. She made the polygamy thing up in her twilight years for whatever reason … for the notoriety … whatever, and didn’t think to go back and revise her bio. That’s what an honest look at the evidence shows.

    In the several podcasts I’ve seen and listened to with Lindsey as a guest, she comes off as highly intelligent. I mean that sincerely. So I can’t believe that she is ignorant of this work that she professes to be so passionate about. Unfortunately, that leaves a black mark on her integrity.

    If one has to be dishonest or deceitful to make Mary’s story fit a predetermined narrative, it calls into question all of the “evidences”. Ie. if you are lying about this one, should I even listen to anything else?

    This deceitful presentation is similar to what Brigham Young started in 1844. Change the journals, change the scripture, change the history … make Joseph a polygamist and the mormons will believe “the brethren’s” adultery is a celestial law. Being in company with Brigham Young is not a good place for anyone to put themselves.

    The truth hurts sometimes. But only if you’re a liar.

    Mark Rollins

    Reply

    • Tracy Averett

      |

      Didn’t the church come out and and admit that Joseph Smith did practice polygamy and polyandry?

      Reply

    • flug

      |

      I think your beef is far more with Todd Compton, researcher and author of In Sacred Loneliness. Lindsay is following that research pretty closely.

      Conveniently, Compton’s chapter on Mary Rollins is online here:

      http://user.xmission.com/~plporter/lds/merlsy.htm

      Unfortunately for the argument you are making, there is quite a lot more evidence outlined in that chapter than one single speech at BYU. Among the evidence is other people who were in the Nauvoo mileu of the time openly acknowledging Mary’s sealings to Smith and Young some decades before the BYU speech. That is pretty hard to explain away.

      Reply

  • Solar Street Light

    |

    Have you ever considered about including a little bit more than just your articles? I mean, what you say is fundamental and all. But think about if you added some great photos or videos to give your posts more, “pop”! Your content is excellent but with images and video clips, this blog could definitely be one of the best in its field. Terrific blog!

    Reply

  • PVC Coil Mat Roll

    |

    I like what you guys are up also. Such clever work and reporting! Keep up the excellent works guys I have incorporated you guys to my blogroll. I think it will improve the value of my website :).

    Reply

  • LED Einbauleuchten

    |

    Nice post. I study one thing more difficult on completely different blogs everyday. It can all the time be stimulating to learn content material from other writers and apply a bit something from their store. I’d desire to use some with the content material on my blog whether or not you don’t mind. Natually I’ll give you a link in your net blog. Thanks for sharing.

    Reply

  • pacanele

    |

    I’d perpetually want to be update on new articles on this internet site, bookmarked! .

    Reply

  • g think

    |

    Wonderful beat ! I wish to apprentice while
    you amend your site, how could i subscribe for a blog site?
    The account helped me a acceptable deal. I had been tiny bit acquainted of this your broadcast provided bright clear concept

    Reply

Leave a comment